Quadro RTX 8000 vs RTX A2000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1770MHz vs 1612MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+97%
16310
RTX A2000 Embedded
8253
Blender
Quadro RTX 8000
+42%
2844
RTX A2000 Embedded
2001
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 8000
+24%
337
RTX A2000 Embedded
271
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1117 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1612 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
20
4608
Shading Units
2560
288
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
80
72
RT Cores
20
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.38 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.0 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.253 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.253 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
129.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GA107S
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
754 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
