Quadro RTX 8000 vs Tesla M2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+1486%
16310
Tesla M2075
1028
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
14
4608
Shading Units
448
288
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GF110
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
