Quadro RTX 8000 vs Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1950MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
+308%
16310
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3994
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
72
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1024
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
DG2-128
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
