Radeon Graphics 128SP vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 128SP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 128SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 128SP
+518%
563
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Navi II IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
128
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
2
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
1126 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
563.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Raphael
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
264 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
