Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
464 additional rendering cores
GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
+2150%
2048
GeForce 320M
91
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Vega II IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
128.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
23W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Barcelo
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
180 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
