Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs UHD Graphics 610
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 610 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon HD 8400 IGP 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
UHD Graphics 610 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
154
UHD Graphics 610
+31%
202
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
Kabini
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
2
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
403.2 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
201.6 GFLOPS
9.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kalindi
GPU Name
Comet Lake GT1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.178 billion
Transistors
Unknown
110 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
