Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+1001%
5728
FirePro V3800
520
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
5
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Redwood
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.7
Shader Model
5.0
