Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon RX 7900 GRE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 GRE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)
Radeon RX 7900 GRE 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2245MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
+702%
45980
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jul 2023
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Navi III(RX 7000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1287 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2245 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
80
2304
Shading Units
5120
144
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
160
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
359.2 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
718.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.96 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.98 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1437 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 31
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XL
(215-145000206)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
