Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+5%
5728
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5437
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Feb 2019
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2304
Shading Units
1536
144
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
TU116
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6