Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+10%
5728
Radeon RX 5300 XT
5196
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Oct 2019
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
22
2304
Shading Units
1408
144
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 14
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
