Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 475W)
Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Radeon Pro Vega II
+145%
14090
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2019
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
64
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
475W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Vega 20
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
