Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Radeon RX 7900 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Radeon RX 7900 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2394MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
Radeon RX 7900 XT
+798%
51480
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Nov 2022
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1387 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
84
2304
Shading Units
5376
144
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
192
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
103.0 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
51.48 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.609 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 31
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT
(215-145000156)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
