Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+366%
26730
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2023
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
2304
Shading Units
6144
144
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD104
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8