Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5728
RTX 6000 Ada
+1489%
91060
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Dec 2022
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
2304
Shading Units
18176
144
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD102
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8