Home Comparison Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Radeon Pro W5700X vs GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2040MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (90W vs 205W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W5700X +266%
10440
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2849

Graphics Card

Dec 2019
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1243 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
896
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

130.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
326.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
20.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
10.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
652.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

205W
TDP
90W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 10
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.3 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
251 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net