Radeon R5 Graphics vs GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon R5 Graphics and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R5 Graphics 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 Graphics
+659%
691
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
91
Graphics Card
Sep 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Bristol Ridge
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Wani
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
-
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
6.3
Shader Model
4.1
