Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1335MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 M330
659
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+522%
4101
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
955 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
1536
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
18W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Exo
GPU Name
TU116
Exo PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.7