Radeon R7 240 OEM vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
+1459%
499
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
2
320
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
