Home Comparison Radeon R7 240 OEM vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon R7 240 OEM vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 179% (2175MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
499
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5256%
26730

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
320
Shading Units
6144
20
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
AD104
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net