Radeon R7 240 OEM vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (1762MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 OEM
499
RTX A400
+442%
2706
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
768
20
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Oland
GPU Name
GA107
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8