Radeon R7 250 vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
717
Moore Threads MTT S2000
+1385%
10650
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1300 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
32
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
256
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
