Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (1770MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1894
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
+378%
9062
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1605 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
283.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.12 TFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.062 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
283.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
215W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU104
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
TU104-410-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6