Radeon R9 280 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+7861%
3344
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
42
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
2
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
200W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV610
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE
(215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
