Radeon R9 280 vs CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (1545MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (10GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
CMP 50HX
+231%
11070
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
TU102
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
