Radeon R9 280 vs NVS 810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1033MHz vs 933MHz)
Lower TDP (68W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
+216%
3344
NVS 810
1058
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 280
+287%
2009
NVS 810
519
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Nov 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
902 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
68W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GM107
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
