Radeon R9 280 vs P104 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
P104 101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1683MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3344
P104 101
+157%
8617
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jan 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
827 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
125W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GP104
Tahiti PRO3
(215-0821330)
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4