Radeon R9 295X2 vs CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
1408 additional rendering cores
CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (125W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+14%
5733
CMP 30HX
5027
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Feb 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
2816
Shading Units
1408
176
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
125W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU116
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.8