Radeon R9 295X2 vs H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
5733
H200 NVL
+952%
60320
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Nov 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
2816
Shading Units
16896
176
TMUs
528
64
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GH100
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A
