Radeon R9 295X2 vs MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
768 additional rendering cores
MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (85W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+16%
5733
MTT S50
4915
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Oct 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
85W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
