Radeon R9 295X2 vs P106 090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
P106 090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+143%
5733
P106 090
2352
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Jul 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
GP106
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.8
