Radeon R9 295X2 vs Radeon RX 6300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+82%
5733
Radeon RX 6300
3133
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
12
2816
Shading Units
768
176
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x HDMI 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 24
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
