Radeon R9 295X2 vs T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+424%
5733
T400 4 GB
1094
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
384
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
30W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU117
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6