Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+332%
2989
FirePro W4190M
691
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2015
Crystal System
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
6
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Opal
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.3
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
