Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs NVS 5200M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM NVS 5200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVS 5200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+1145%
2989
NVS 5200M
240
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Crystal System
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GF117
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N13M-NS1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1