Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+29%
2989
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2304
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6