Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2989
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+37%
4101
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2019
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU116
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.7