Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+139%
2989
Radeon E9172 MXM
1248
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Oct 2017
Crystal System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
8
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Lexa
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
