Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+39%
2989
Radeon E9260 MXM
2150
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
Crystal System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Baffin
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
