Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 560M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 60.00GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 560M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+525%
3723
GeForce GTX 560M
595
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 500M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
60.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.80 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
595.2 GFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
GF116
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
N12E-GS-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1