Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+62%
3723
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
2285
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
896
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.80 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
71.40 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.570 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.285 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
71.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
31W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
TU117
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
