Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro W6300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
+18%
3723
Radeon Pro W6300M
3133
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 24
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
