Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs Radeon Pro W6600M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2034MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3723
Radeon Pro W6600M
+95%
7290
Graphics Card
May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2021
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1224 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2034 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
28
-
SM Count
66
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.2 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
227.8 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.58 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.290 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
455.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
90W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Amethyst
GPU Name
Navi 23
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7
