Home Comparison Radeon RX 460 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Radeon RX 460 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 460 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2010MHz vs 1180MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
2115
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +483%
12350

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1180 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
896
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

18.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
66.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
2.115 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
2.115 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
132.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
AD107
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net