Home Comparison Radeon RX 6400 vs FirePro S7150

Radeon RX 6400 vs FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2321MHz
Lower TDP (53W vs 150W)
FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
3565
FirePro S7150 +5%
3768

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
-
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
32
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

53W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net