Radeon X1650 GT vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
