Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon X1650 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GT218
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
4.1