Radeon X1650 GT vs FirePro RG220
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
May 2010
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
-
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
M93
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
Shader Model
4.1
