Radeon X1650 GT vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2535 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
34
-
Shading Units
4352
8
TMUs
136
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
136
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.7 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
344.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
22.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
344.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
160W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
AD104
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
AD104-150-K1-A1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
