Radeon X1650 GT vs H200 NVL
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 141GB VRAM H200 NVL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2024
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Server Hopper
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
4.89TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
132
-
Shading Units
16896
8
TMUs
528
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
50 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.84 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
942.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
241.3 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
60.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.16 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV560
GPU Name
GH100
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
80 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
3.0
Shader Model
N/A
