Home Comparison Radeon X1650 GT vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Radeon X1650 GT vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
-
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV560
GPU Name
AD104
RV560 GT
GPU Variant
-
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.312 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
230 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net